Psychiatrists should have less influence over psychiatric inpatients, says report
November 24, 2011
by Angela Hussain
Psychiatrists should have less power when making decisions on mental health patients in acute care, according to a new report.
Instead, psychiatric inpatients should have more support from peers who have experienced mental health problems, concluded a report by mental health charity Mind into acute and crisis mental health care in England and Wales.
Reducing the overall medical emphasis in patient care and treatment was one of four key recommendations in the report, produced after Mind held an investigation into mental health inpatient care.
Mind met mental health groups, services and individual experts, including service users, from January 2010 to August 2011. It also received 350 responses from a Mind website questionnaire.
"The needs people described – care, safety, someone to listen, something to do – did not require a medically dominant response,” read the report.
"People told us about the value of different people who have supported them from across the range of mental health professions as well as non-professional
"While some emphasized ‘trained professionals’, many people would prefer
more peer support from people who have themselves experienced mental health problems.”
The report, entitled “Listening to Experience”, argued that psychiatrists would be more effective if they contributed as part of a team or were available for consultancy “rather than always ‘in charge’ or wholly ‘responsible’ for care.”
"We accept that doctors play a valuable role but this does not mean that they should head a hierarchy of professions,” read the report.
In 2010 more than 100,000 people were inpatients in a psychiatric units, such as
emergency departments, crisis resolution, home treatment teams and community services.
The report’s other key recommendations were that inpatients should have more choice and control, be treated with more humanity, and that commissioning be improved.
Mind said while its inquiry found examples of good care with courteous and helpful staff and well-designed environments, there were also examples of poor and
traumatic experiences in care.
The report, which included numerous accounts of patient experiences in crisis care, also made a number of recommendations for inpatient staff.
These included that they “share something” of themselves with patients.
"Not all your problems, but enough of your life to engage on an ordinary human level,” stated the report.
Also recommended was a commitment to working in non-violent ways and use de-escalation techniques first.
Paul Burstow, care services minister in England, said the report shone "a light on the good, the bad and the unacceptable".
He said he wanted to work with Mind to take forward work on the report's recommendations.
Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service, whose staff had experience of mental health crisis, and London’s Maytree Sanctuary, which recruited people for their listening skills, and not qualifications, were mentioned as “most valued” services.
Read for yourself:
Mind's Listening to Experience report
Peer support workers help recovery
From: Carolyn Amderson, Vice Chair of the National Service Unser Network, London
Date: December 5, 2011
I am passionate about seeing service users/survivors employed as Peer Support Workers. They can work in so many different areas to enhance recovery.
If you are supported by someone who has been in the same dark place as you are in and that person has recovered then this gives you the hope that you too can and will recover. It would be super to see some funding for training forthcoming.
Big issue - wards
Big issue - service provision
do you think? Email your comments on the above
article to the editor using the form below. Selected comments will
© 2001-7 Psychminded Limited. All
about this article